tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22498220.post97949876446376412..comments2021-05-28T04:54:45.702+02:00Comments on Martinned: Tay Zamartinnedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15282998467090268537noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22498220.post-75529180429764926812012-03-15T15:12:06.048+01:002012-03-15T15:12:06.048+01:00From a legal basis point of view, the limitation w...From a legal basis point of view, the limitation would be that it would have to be about foreign policy. (Or defence policy.)<br /><br />Beyond that, the normal limitations identified in the other cases still apply. The Council may not arbitrarily infringe on someone's right to property, must give a statement of reason, hear the "defendant" whenever possible, etc.martinnedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15282998467090268537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22498220.post-16064297275205060862012-03-14T20:00:32.443+01:002012-03-14T20:00:32.443+01:00Martin, I think I completely agree with you, but d...Martin, I think I completely agree with you, but doubt whether the treaty legislator implied this intentionally. In your interpetation there would hardly be any limits to the use of the new sanction competence. We may indeed have to wait for a new (post-Lisbon) case.<br />Ramses A. WesselAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com